Translator

English flagItalian flagKorean flagChinese (Simplified) flagChinese (Traditional) flagPortuguese flagGerman flagFrench flagSpanish flagJapanese flag
Arabic flagRussian flagGreek flagDutch flagBulgarian flagCzech flagCroatian flagDanish flagFinnish flagHindi flag
Polish flagRomanian flagSwedish flagNorwegian flagCatalan flagFilipino flagHebrew flagIndonesian flagLatvian flagLithuanian flag
Serbian flagSlovak flagSlovenian flagUkrainian flagVietnamese flagAlbanian flagEstonian flagGalician flagMaltese flagThai flag
Turkish flagHungarian flagBelarus flagIrish flagIcelandic flagMacedonian flagMalay flagPersian flag  
  • An error has occurred, which probably means the feed is down. Try again later.

Search

Canis latrans

20130302-214645.jpg

Coyote (Canis latrans) scat. Photo by Stephen M. Vantassel.

Coyote (Canis latrans) Scat

Coyote scat in winter often is full of hair. In this case it looks like deer hair, likely from feeding on deer killed by cars or hunting. Scats are approximately 1/2 inch wide and placed along trails and intersections of trails. Scats can also appear like twisted ropes.

To learn more about identifying scat purchase the Wildlife Damage Inspection Handbook, 3rd ed.

About the Author

Stephen M. Vantassel is a certified wildlife control operator who helps individuals, businesses, and agencies resolve wildlife damage issues through training, writing, expert witness, and research. His latest book is the Wildlife Damage Inspection Handbook, 3rd edition. He can be contacted at wildlifecontrolconsultant at gmail dot com.

If you would like your publication, video, or product reviewed, please contact the author at the e-mail above.

Copyright

All postings are the property of Stephen M. Vantassel and Wildlife Control Consultant, LLC. Text (not images) may be reprinted in non-profit publications provided that the author and website URL is included. If images wish to be used, explicit and written permission must be obtained from Wildlife Control Consultant, LLC.

Coyote (Canis latrans) Predation Research in Virginia

Canis latrans Français : Un coyote en Arizona

Canis latrans Français : Un coyote en Arizona (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

Over the past 30 years, coyotes have expanded their range dramatically. Whereas they originally only resided in the mid to western states of the U.S., today coyotes can be found throughout the eastern seaboard. As a top carnivore, biologists want to know what coyotes are eating.

Research of scats has revealed that 2/3 of coyote scats studied in 2011 contained deer. A similar percentage was found in bobcat scats. Black bear scats, however, revealed the presence of deer in only 36% of the scats. The scat study was limited to Virginia.

These findings show that scientists need to learn more about the cumulative effect of these predators on deer populations. Since deer are an important resource, learning more about the interactions of predation is particularly relevant to wildlife management officials.

Source: Bock, Bob. 2012. Coyote Research in Virginia. Wildlife Professional 6:3(Fall):74.

About the Author

Stephen M. Vantassel is a certified wildlife control operator who helps individuals, businesses, and agencies resolve wildlife damage issues through training, writing, expert witness, and research. His latest book is the Wildlife Damage Inspection Handbook, 3rd edition. He can be contacted at wildlifecontrolconsultant at gmail dot com.

If you would like your publication, video, or product reviewed, please contact the author at the e-mail above.

Copyright

All postings are the property of Stephen M. Vantassel and Wildlife Control Consultant, LLC. Text (not images) may be reprinted in non-profit publications provided that the author and website URL is included. If images wish to be used, explicit and written permission must be obtained from Wildlife Control Consultant, LLC.

Enhanced by Zemanta

The Urban Coyote Management Workshop

Rob Erickson of On Target ADC demonstrating the Metro Barrel. Photo by Stephen M. Vantassel

On April 21, 2011, the Izaak Walton League hosted the Urban Coyote Management Workshop sponsored by the Wildlife Damage Management Working Group of the Wildlife Society and the University of Nebraska-Lincoln School of Natural Resources. This was the second workshop on wildlife damage management hosted by the Izaak Walton League. The previous workshop, held in 2010, focused on shooting in sensitive environments.

The Rise of Human-Coyote Conflicts

A workshop on the management of coyotes may seem strange to members of the Izaak Walton League given that conflicts with coyotes in Nebraska tend to center on livestock predation. Yet, in many parts of the U.S., conflicts with coyotes are on the rise. While coyotes typically attack pets and scavenge on trash, instances of coyote attacks on humans, including one death of a 19 year-old in Cape Breton Highlands National Park Canada in October 2009, are not unheard of. In light of these events, the Wildlife Damage Management Working Group decided that a hands-on workshop on the management of coyotes in urban areas was needed.

Coyote Damage Management Training

Tim Julian of A&T Wildlife teaching a class on using cable-restraints to capture coyotes.

Tim Julian teaching the Collarum Trap at the Urban Coyote Management Workshop. Photo by Stephen M. Vantassel

The workshop began at 8:00 A.M. The 38 participants were divided into three groups based on their experience with shooting and trapping coyotes. The groups were assigned to the three field stations which consisted of shooting, footholds, and snares and cable restraints. The groups remained at each station for one hour before transitioning to the next in round robin fashion. Although the morning temperature was in the low 40’s and accompanied by a regular breeze, attendees took advantage of the opportunity for some hands-on experience.

Hands-On Coyote Damage Management Training

In the shooting section, Rob Erickson of On Target ADC, demonstrated the benefits of a 12-gauge shotgun fitted with a Metro barrel and the proper use of suppressed and unsuppressed .22 caliber firearms. With League member Dr. Scott Hygnstrom as range master, Erickson covered firearm selection, shot placement, safety rules, and other considerations when dealing with urban coyotes. All attendees were able to to shoot a wide range of firearms and ammunition. Footholds, traditional and padded-jaw, were discussed by Chad Richardson of USDA-Wildlife Services-Nebraska. He demonstrated setting techniques and  had each of the attendees make their own dirt hole set. Those new to trapping quickly discovered that setting dirt holes in wet clay soil is not easy. In the cable restraint and snaring area, Tim Julien of A & T Wildlife explained the finer points of using snares and cable-restraints for coyotes. As an added bonus, the manufacturer of the Collarum™ trap, which is a canine specific and live-trapping device that captures them by looping a relaxing cable over their neck, helped oversee setting the trap. While certainly, one hour of instruction for each of these sections is inadequate, the goal of the workshop was to provide attendees with an introduction to the tools and techniques useful for urban coyote management. In that regard, we consider the training successful.

Cage Trapping Coyotes

After a quick lunch, Claude Oleyar of Equalizer Wildlife Control in Colorado, gave instruction on the use of cage traps in the capture of coyotes. He explained the challenges and the opportunity that cage traps provide. The rest of the day was spent inside the lodge. Rob Erickson spoke for the next two hours on surveillance in site selection as well as handling clients. He demonstrated how attendees could use Google Earth to assist them in finding dense sites in urban areas. He also described  difficulties in handling municipal coyote control jobs. He repeatedly cautioned participants about the importance of being careful, professional, and using the best equipment available.

Media and the Control of Coyotes

Joe LaBarbera of the LaBarbera Media Group rounded out the day by helping attendees understand how to handle the press. As a former news reporter, LaBarbera explained how reporters are under tremendous time pressure and noted that reporters will report a story whether you speak to them or not. LaBarbera said it is critical that you provide the facts and that you avoid saying “no comment.” In no circumstances should you ever say something is “off the record” cautioning that there is no such thing.  He encouraged attendees to begin building relationships with reporters so that your perspective will be treated fairly which is the best that you can hope for. LaBarbera provided explicit rules of dos and don’ts in media relations which provided everyone with strategies for a more successful experience in dealing with the media. The workshop concluded with supper from Parker’s Smokehouse, which included beef, pulled pork, muffins, and baked beans along with apple crisp for dessert.

Future Coyote Training Opportunities

The Wildlife Damage Management Working Group and the University of Nebraska-Lincoln School of Natural Resources wishes to thank the Izaak Walton League for making their facilities available to us. In addition, we express our special thanks to Mike Kunkee for his willingness to go beyond the call of duty to help us. We also thank the kitchen staff of the Thursday night Trap League for “sharing” the kitchen with us. We commend the League for its leadership in helping us provide research-based information on wildlife damage management to the public.

Authors

Stephen M. Vantassel, Project Coordinator http://icwdm.org
Scott E. Hygnstrom, Professor-School of Natural Resources, UNL
A coyote in Yosemite National Park, California...

Coyote (Canis latrans) Image via Wikipedia

Stages of Coyote (Canis latrans) Aggression

Robert H. Schmidt of Utah State University, Logan, UT, USA and Robert M. Timm of the Hopland Research & Extension Center, University of California, Hopland, CA, USA authored an interesting paper entitled “Bad Dogs” Why do Coyotes and Other Canids Become Unruly? published in the Proceedings of the 12th Wildlife Damage Management Conference (D.L. Nolte, W.M. Arjo, D.H. Stalman, Eds). 2007.

As the title suggests, the authors reviewed how canids in general and coyotes in particular transition from fearing humans and their presence to attacking them. Among the nuggets of information they provide is a reference to the work of Rex Baker and Robert Timm (same author as this article) which outlines the stages of coyote aggression.

Stages of Coyote Aggression

The stages are as follows in increasing order of severity:

  1. An increase in observing coyotes on streets and in yards at night.
  2. An increase in coyotes approaching adults and/or taking pets at night.
  3. Early morning and late afternoon daylight observance of coyotes on streets and in parks and yards.
  4. Daylight observance of coyotes chasing or taking pets.
  5. Coyotes attacking and taking pets on leash or in close proximity to their owners; coyotes chasing joggers,bicyclists, and other adults.
  6. Coyotes seen in and around children’s play areas, school grounds, and parks in mid-day.
  7. Coyotes acting aggressively toward adults during mid-day”

These behavioral descriptions are extremely useful in evaluating reported behavior to help determine whether the coyote is a potential threat to human health and safety. After all, some will fear the very sight of a coyote. I would hope that communities wouldn’t launch a coyote eradication program simply because a coyote was spotted. The categories described by Rex and Timm help animal damage control professionals and animal control officers decide whether a lethal intervention is necessary.

About the Author

Stephen M. Vantassel, CWCP is a specialist in wildlife damage management and human-wildlife relations issues. He is available for presentations, writing, and consultation. His latest book is the National Wildlife Control Training Program (2010) available from the University of Nebraska-Lincoln and Cornell Universities.

Enhanced by Zemanta
A coyote standing by a road in Arizona

Urban coyotes are becoming more common across much of the U.S. Image via Wikipedia

Suburban Howls by Jonathan G. Way: A Review

Jonathan Way began his research on coyotes (Canis latrans) while attending high school in Cape Cod Massachusetts. The passion to learn more about coyotes motivated him to continue his education in the sciences, ultimately culminating in obtaining a Ph.D. in 2005 from Boston College.

Way uses Suburban Howls to disseminate his research findings to a non-academic audience. But the book is more than just a source for facts. For in many instances, Suburban Howls is a political manifesto and personal diary because it details Way’s intimate thoughts, feelings, triumphs and frustrations about his work with coyotes. Anyone interested in learning what a doctoral student in wildlife science must endure to achieve his/her degree will find this book enlightening.

Substance of the Book

Way’s research encompasses 3 different components and the book is organized around those research foci. The first component was the field study where Way had to capture coyotes and attach radio-collars on them in order to monitor their movements and activity. This research protocol is not unusual except Way is not trapping coyotes in states with reasonable wildlife control law; he is trapping them in Massachusetts, where in 1996 the citizens foolishly listened to the animal rights protest industry groups and voted to ban foothold traps even for research purposes. The passage of this referendum meant that Way could not use efficient, low-cost and humane tools to catch coyotes but instead he had to spend thousands of hours trying to catch coyotes in cage traps, which, as he discovered, has an efficiency rate of less than 1%. Phrased differently, Way had to monitor a trap for 100 days (on average) to catch a single coyote. The joys and trials of this highly time-wasting, and indiscriminate capture method are chronicled in painful detail.

The second component consisted of his experience raising coyote young in captivity. After obtaining the necessary permits, a significant obstacle in itself, Way details his experience in finding a litter of coyote pups and the monumental effort given to their care in the first 60 days. Given the lack of sleep that he endured, one can only wonder where he found the physical and psychological fortitude to complete the task.

The final component involved creating a curriculum based on his coyote research to enhance student understanding of coyotes and encourage student engagement and learning about the natural world and science in general. His description of his interaction with a high school class convinced me that I wish I had a class like his when I attended High School.

Evaluation of Surban Howls

It is difficult to evaluate this text because it doesn’t neatly fall into any of the traditional categories. As I stated above, Way writes about his research findings along with extended descriptions of his personal thoughts and emotions. The book is part science paper and part diary. In addition, Way repeatedly preaches to the reader about the evils of hunting and trapping and why America’s relationship with coyotes needs drastic alteration.

I can appreciate his frustration. I am sure it is heartbreaking to spend hundreds of hours trying to cage-trap a coyote only to lose that coyote to a hunter’s bullet before all the data is gathered. I would probably be angry too. But to vent anger at hunters, when the majority of his coyotes were lost to automobiles seemed misguided and could be considered a form of psychological transference. Transference is a term to describe a person’s tendency to express emotion to someone or something that is unrelated to the actual source of that emotion. It is like being angry at your boss but you don’t get angry at the boss, instead you go home and kick the dog.

I found it slightly ironic that Way rails against the public’s and media’s ignorant views regarding coyotes yet he himself holds a number of ignorant views about hunters and trappers. He tries to separate bad hunters (he calls them red necks) from the ethical hunters, but his disdain about hunting in general makes the distinction less than persuasive. For example, Way says he cannot understand how hunters can claim to love coyotes and still hunt them. The fact he can’t understand that the love of a human to an animal is of a different order than the love between humans is truly frightening in light of the fact he is a trained wildlife biologist.

Perhaps more disturbing than Way’s animal protectionist bias is his tendency to speak beyond the evidence. On page 4, he makes the unsupported claim that trappers use shotguns to shoot trapped coyotes in the head. A .22 cal round, sure. But a shotgun is just too messy, expensive, and destroys the pelt. I for one would like to see evidence that this occurs, unfortunately, Way provided no evidence. Second, Way decries the injuries of coyotes that are winged but not outright killed by hunters. I can understand his anguish. Sportsmen should always seek to reduce the likelihood of bad catches and bad shots. But to simply call a hunter who made a bad shot a red neck is like calling a surgeon who makes a mistake a butcher.  The fact is we must distinguish between mal-occurrence and malpractice. Just because a shot didn’t go as planned doesn’t mean it was a bad shot from the start. Sometimes the manufacturer’s load was light or a gust of wind moved a branch etc. There is any number of explanations to account for bad outcomes and not all of them are a result of sloppy hunting practices.  There are too many more misunderstandings in his work for me to mention at this time, so I will end with just one more. On page 222, he tells homeowners to stop using rodenticides to control mice and get a house cat instead. I was stunned to see this claim by a trained biologist as it demonstrated how little he knew about the control of commensal rodents. If he is just worried about mice in the living space, then cats will work fine. But I suspect homeowners don’t want mice in the walls either which is where cats are completely useless. If you don’t believe me, read the literature by Dr. Robert Corrigan.

Final Comments about Suburban Howls

In sum, if you want to learn a little about urban coyotes interspersed with long diatribes about how Way was “wronged” or angry about coyote policies then this book is for you. The narrative is light and easy to read and filled with lots of anthropocentric images of Way holding and interacting with coyotes. If you want less fluff and more solid, straightforward research, skip this book and read his journal articles instead.

About the Reviewer

Stephen M. Vantassel is a Certified Wildlife Control Professional and specialist in wildlife damage management. His most recent book is the National Wildlife Control Training Program (2010) published by the University of Nebraska-Lincoln and Cornell University.

Enhanced by Zemanta
A coyote standing by a road in Arizona

Image via Wikipedia

Urban Coyote Management Workshop

Urban Coyote Management Workshop will be held in Nebraska City, NE on April 20-21, 2011.

Coyotes (Canis latrans) have been increasing in numbers and range in the U.S. Individuals and agencies interested in learning how to manage human-coyote conflicts in urban settings would do well to attend this workshop.

Wednesday (April 20, 2011) begins at noon with lectures on coyote related issues. Thursday (April 21, 2011) participants will learn the fundamentals of shooting, snaring, cable-restraints, trapping, site selection and public relations.

To learn more about this workshop and the 14th Wildlife Damage Management Conference, visit http://wildlifedamagegroup.unl.edu/meetings.html

Enhanced by Zemanta