Theological – Page 2

June 22, 2018 by Stephen M. Vantassel

The MeatEater podcast

God, Nimrod and the World: Exploring Christian Perspectives on Sport Hunting.

The MeatEater Podcast is a production by Steven Rinella of MeatEater.com. A quick look at the site shows that it is named correctly. As it is all about meat, eating meat, acquiring meat, etc. I had

Dominion over Wildlife? An Environmental-Theology of Human-Wildlife Relations, by Stephen M. Vantassel.

the privilege of being mentioned on the June 4,2018 podcast episode 119 titled “Walking the Edge.” Mr. Rinella is interviewing Dr. Bracy V. Hill who is the editor, along with John B. White, of God, Nimrod, and the World: Exploring Christian Perspectives on Sport Hunting. Mercer University Press, Sports & Religion Series, 2017. Dr. Hill mentions me in the podcast at 1:36:44 which means at one hour, 36 minutes and 44 seconds. He doesn’t spend much time on my view, unfortunately as it should accord quite nicely with the position of the Meateater Podcast.

The reason why Dr. Hill mentions me is because I have a chapter in that book where I defend the traditional dominion view of humanity’s relationship with animals and the broader creation. That chapter flows from my dissertation which was published in expanded form in Dominion over Wildlife? An Environmental-Theology of Human-Wildlife Relations published by Wipf and Stock. That book explains why Christians should reject the animal rights protest industry views because they fail to account for scripture (both Old and New Testaments), ethics, and science. Yes, veganism is not as green as they purport it to be. In fact, I would suggest that veganism likely reduces the planet’s ability to feed a growing population. Of course, if you look deeper into the vegan movement and its so-called environmental supporters, you will see that there is a fundamental antagonism to humans. Thus they seek to diminish human numbers through voluntary celibacy, abortion, and contraception.

To listen to the podcast click http://www.themeateater.com/podcasts/theedge/

Stephen M. Vantassel, CWCP, ACE, is the owner of Wildlife Control Consultant, LLC. He helps people restore their balance with nature through publishing, training, consulting, and the internet. He has published numerous articles in trade and academic publications available at {Stephen’s Academia.edu Page} along with several books {WCC Store}). Listen to his podcast “Living the Wild Life” at {Pest Geek Podcast}. Click the links for past {shows} and {interviews}. Please subscribe to {Stephen’s YouTube Channel} He is a sought after speaker and trainer. If you would like to have Stephen speak at your event or use his consultation services, send an e-mail to [email protected] Copyright All postings are the property of Stephen M. Vantassel and Wildlife Control Consultant, LLC. Text (not images) may be reprinted in non-profit publications provided that the author and website URL is included. If images wish to be used, explicit and written permission must be obtained from Wildlife Control Consultant, LLC.

February 24, 2017 by Stephen M. Vantassel

Animal Rights and Vehicles

Animal rights and vehicles. What on earth could these two concepts have in common? Actually, they should have a lot in common but they don’t. Why? Animal rights activists don’t discuss them. They like people to think that they care about animals and are working to protect them from needless harm. Sounds wonderful doesn’t it? Yet, they conveniently ignore the carnage on our roads.

A bird killed by a vehicle. Photo: Stephen M. Vantassel

Why do they ignore this issue? I suspect the reason is that animal rights protest industry activists avoid the political heat of attacking activities that many people perform. Attacking the behavior of masses of people is the short path to political suicide. Animal rights protest activists, of course, are smarter than that. Or should I say, that most of the animal rights protest industry activists I have met were certainly smarter than that.

From one perspective, it makes sense to discuss issues that are more likely to be changed in our society. Okay, I can accept that. But doesn’t it seem a bit sneaky to not state the complete goal of one’s ideology? For example, pro-life activists will work to stop certain forms of abortion, but they are very clear that they oppose all abortions done except to save the physical life of the mother. Why don’t the animal rights activists make a similar declaration about their ultimate goals? Why don’t they tell society that they are against all animal killing, including that done by vehicles and that they will be enacting regulations to stop the carnage on our roads?

If someone has an answer I would love to hear it.

Stephen M. Vantassel is a major critic of the animal rights protest industry and loves to debate the topic when animal rights protest industry activists feel brave enough to engage in the dialogue.

September 18, 2016 by Stephen M. Vantassel

Montana Ballot 2016 Initiative 177

I thought I would publish this letter from the Montana Trapper’s Association regarding the effort by Footloose Montana to ban trapping on public land by non-government personnel.

Feedback is welcomed.

Anti trapping billboard by Trap Free Montana placed in East Helena, Montana. Photo taken in September, 2018.

Stephen M. Vantassel, CWCP, ACE

Update. Nov 2019. Even though Initiative 177 failed to pass, the billboard at the right shows that the animal rights protest industry activists never give up.

Dear Fellow Outdoorsman,

In Montana, for the past two centuries we have had the privilege of enjoying our trapping activities largely unfettered by unnecessary regulation and threat to our pursuit. We are now threatened with the loss of trapping on public land by the threat of Ballot Initiative I-177 which will be voted on this November.

We need your help.

We are now threatened by the most vicious, callous, and ruthless opponent that we have ever seen before. There are Animal Rights Activists, temporarily based in Missoula but funded by out-of-state sources, that are hell bent on taking away our trapping heritage. Their self-stated goal is to go after trapping, then hunting with hounds, then bear hunting, then all hunting, and then fishing. They will wear us down, and if we don’t act NOW our grandchildren will likely never know the joys that we have experienced in the outdoors.

We need to put up a firewall NOW and stop these anti’s in their tracks. If we lose our privilege to trap on public land in Montana then we will certainly lose our ability to trap on ALL land in Montana altogether. And other states will soon follow.

That’s why I am asking you to donate $56 to the Montana Trappers Association to help fight this threat. That’s just $1 for every county in our state.

And I know that some folks will be unable to make a contribution at this time, but if you can help with any donation, whether it be $25, $50, $100 or more, we’d be sincerely grateful for your generous donation. The fact of the matter is, we need the funds right NOW because the election is on November 8th and coming at us fast. We need to get the word out to all of the people who don’t necessarily oppose trapping, but might be easily swayed by the emotional attack ads and information generated by the Animal Rights Extremists. Again, that’s just $56 for a crucial victory on Election Day that will mean everything to our trapping culture.

The President of the Montana Trappers Association tells us that Montanans are facing what may be the most important legal challenge to sportsmen’s rights in the history of our state. In November Montana citizens will be asked to vote whether the long standing tradition of trapping will continue on public lands. As a battle ground state, the outcome of this fight will affect sportsmen across the country and that’s why I’m writing to you.

Trapping has proven to be a necessary part of Montana’s wildlife management practices for decades. It is also a source of income for Montana families and predator control for ranchers and farmers who need it most. But that’s just the beginning.

Time spent with my uncle learning how to hunt and trap on public lands are my earliest childhood memories. Because we trapped and hunted together then I still yearn to be surrounded by nature now. And as I watch that outdoor passion growing in my own grandchildren’s eyes I can only think that all Montana children deserve days like these.

The fact is that Animal Rights activists are pushing their agenda onto Montanans. I-177 is bad for wildlife, costly for cattle and sheep ranchers, bad for taxpayers, and even dangerous for pets and people. With so much public land in Montana it seems unreasonable to think that there isn’t enough room for everybody to share the landscape. There are many reasons to oppose I-177 but here are a few key points to know about I-177:

I-177 would ban one of the most effective and essential methods for controlling wolves, coyotes, and other predators to protect Montana’s elk, moose and deer populations, as well as livestock.

 I-177 will cost at least $422,000 in taxpayer money every year for the Montana Department of Fish, Wildlife and Parks to do the same things that trappers currently buy a license to do at no cost.

 Roughly 40% of all wolves harvested in Montana are taken by regulated trapping with nearly half taken on public lands. Imagine the wolf population without trapping!

 I-177 is being pushed by the animal rights and anti-hunting lobby whose real agenda is to ban all trapping and all hunting.

 I-177 is opposed by Montana’s major sportsmen’s organizations, cattle and sheep ranchers and wildlife management professionals.

 I-177 would not allow any trapping until after damage or even a tragedy has occurred, and even then, not until non-lethal methods have been tried and documented to be unsuccessful for 30 days. Meanwhile, dangerous predator populations will continue to grow unchecked.

As a hunter, trapper and angler in Montana I don’t want to see unnecessary infringements on our outdoor heritage. A real threat to our outdoor legacy is happening and if there was ever a time to stand together, that time is now. The effort will be enormous but we must work together to preserve Montana’s outdoor legacy.

So please, we need you to make an urgent contribution of $56 or more to the Montana Trappers Association or the Montanans for Wildlife and Public Land Access.

Donations can be made through the MTA website: http://montanatrappers.org/donations.htm

Don’t let it be known that the Great State of Montana lost the battle to preserve our trapping culture against the Animal Rights Extremists!!

Sincerely,

Jeff Rader

Montana Trappers Association, montanatrappers.org

p.s. To those of you who have already contributed to our cause in defeating Ballot Initiative I-177, please don’t disregard this message. Instead, please forward this message on to all the folks in your email address book who are sympathetic to this cause. This includes bowhunters, houndsmen, fishermen, boaters and any other outdoors person you can think of. We have to stop the anti’s at the Montana border before it gets to YOUR state!!! I know some of you have extensive email address lists that would be beneficial to our cause, please circulate this!! And THANK YOU in advance!

September 28, 2015 by Stephen M. Vantassel

Animal Cruelty

Those that have been following my work know that I have been a long-standing opponent of the animal rights movement. I have published an article at http://www.cornwallalliance.org/2015/09/28/seal-hunting-and-definitions-of-cruelty/ It may be of interest to you.

Stephen M. Vantassel

May 18, 2015 by Stephen M. Vantassel

Stephen on the BBC

Stephen M. Vantassel was invited to participate on the BBC show, “All Things Considered.” Stephen had to compete with 3 animal protectionists in the United Kingdom. We discussed the theology of human-animal relations. Although Stephen has been a critic of Dr. Andrew Linzey for years (who has yet to respond), he was pleased to have the opportunity to debate his daughter.

You can listen to the show by clicking the bar below.

The MeatEater podcast

Like this:

Animal Rights and Vehicles

Like this:

Montana Ballot 2016 Initiative 177

Montana Ballot 2016 Initiative 177

Like this:

Animal Cruelty

Like this:

Stephen on the BBC

Like this:

Search

Share this:

Like this:

Share this:

Like this:

Montana Ballot 2016 Initiative 177

Share this:

Like this:

Share this:

Like this:

Share this:

Like this:

Search

Tags